Rolling Handbook i

(Source: starlingswarm, via socialistscum)

June 2, 2012 @ 8:21 PM 173 notes
June 2, 2012 @ 12:25 AM 1 note

(Source: thugzmansion, via punkmermaid)

June 2, 2012 @ 12:19 AM 1,352 notes

lambandserpent:

Soldaderas were female soldiers who went into combat alongside men during the Mexican Revolution, which initially broke out in opposition to the conservative Díaz regime. The term comes from the Spanish word soldada which denotes a payment made to the person who provided for a soldier’s well being.[1]The majority of these women led ordinary lives, but took up arms during the war to fight for freedom. Among the soldaderas, Dolores Jiménez y Muro, Margarita Neri, and Hermila Galindo are often considered heroines in contemporary Mexico.

Today, the term La Adelita is used with pride among Mexican women. La Adelita was the title of a Corrido (folk ballad) about a soldadera named “Adelita”, and became one of the most beloved songs to come out of the Revolution.

Soldaderas,” camp followers in the revolution, cooked, nursed, and provided sexual and emotional comfort. Some fought and were executed in the course of battle. The image of “la soldadera,” the woman fighting on behalf of the Mexican community, was praised as a national symbol of strength and resistance. Yet it was an ambivalent image: praised within the context of an often mythicized revolution, the “soldaderas” were criticized for their relative sexual freedom and independence. The term “soldadera” became double edged. When used to describe an individual women, it could be synonymous with “whore.” source reference -by Devra Weber Oral History and Mexicana Farmworkers

(via socialistscum)

June 1, 2012 @ 10:00 PM 363 notes

abaldwin360:

George Carlin
View Larger

abaldwin360:

George Carlin

(via socialistscum)

June 1, 2012 @ 7:38 PM 502 notes

Protecting fetuses, but not people.

jerrymuffinbutt:

(via paxamericana)

June 1, 2012 @ 7:07 PM 816 notes

stfuconservatives:

teaandcrumpets submitted: “A friend shared this on facebook today.
“NO. Just NO. There is still cotton because people PAY for it. If there are no taxes, who will pay for the roads? If there is no way to pay for it, how can it be built? Are the materials just going to materialize out of thin air? Are the machines just going to magically run themselves? Even if the materials didn’t cost anything, the people laying the roads kind of need to eat and have a place to live, you know! Use your brains!”
—-
I can’t tell you about a cotton shortage, but I can tell you a great story about the collapse of the economy in the south after the abolition of slavery. I know, I know, using historical examples to explain things to Libertarians is about as effective as giving a fish a bicycle. If anything, their complete and utter disregard for American history is a reason we should *increase* taxes. Our schools clearly need more funding for social studies classes.
I love how Paulbots feel totally justified comparing taxes to slavery. Yeah, paying a tiny portion of your salary to cover roads and schools and other social programs that benefit you is totally like being owned by another human being. Totally.


Lol, I love how you use their lack of history knowledge as a reason to give schools more funding.

stfuconservatives:

teaandcrumpets submitted: “A friend shared this on facebook today.

“NO. Just NO. There is still cotton because people PAY for it. If there are no taxes, who will pay for the roads? If there is no way to pay for it, how can it be built? Are the materials just going to materialize out of thin air? Are the machines just going to magically run themselves? Even if the materials didn’t cost anything, the people laying the roads kind of need to eat and have a place to live, you know! Use your brains!”

—-

I can’t tell you about a cotton shortage, but I can tell you a great story about the collapse of the economy in the south after the abolition of slavery. I know, I know, using historical examples to explain things to Libertarians is about as effective as giving a fish a bicycle. If anything, their complete and utter disregard for American history is a reason we should *increase* taxes. Our schools clearly need more funding for social studies classes.

I love how Paulbots feel totally justified comparing taxes to slavery. Yeah, paying a tiny portion of your salary to cover roads and schools and other social programs that benefit you is totally like being owned by another human being. Totally.

Lol, I love how you use their lack of history knowledge as a reason to give schools more funding.

June 1, 2012 @ 1:58 AM 159 notes

saschaeatsteeth:

Fact

saschaeatsteeth:

Fact

(Source: sergioh)

June 1, 2012 @ 1:49 AM 3,843 notes
June 1, 2012 @ 12:44 AM 86 notes
June 1, 2012 @ 12:00 AM 157 notes